THE ANALYSIS OF TWO ESL/EFL WEBSITES: ENGLISHCLUB AND ACTIVITIES FOR ESL STUDENTS

Antonia Tefa(1*), Flora Debora Floris(2),


(1) English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study reviewed two well known ESL/EFL websites namely EnglishClub and Activities for ESL Students using the website evaluation framework proposed by Hasan and Abuelrub (2011). The writers found that Activities for ESL Students met 79.92% of the website evaluation criteria with 211 of the total score; while EnglishClub met 79.54% of the website evaluation criteria with 210 of the total score. Thus there was no significant difference between these two websites. Both EnglishClub and Activities for ESL Students are good for ESL/EFL learners

Keywords


Website, ESL/EFL Website and Website Evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Activities for ESL Students. Retrieved from http://a4esl.org.

Ciaffaroni, M.T. (2006). How Good are ESL/EFL Websites?. Retrieved from http://www.tewtjournal.org/VOL%206/ISSUE%204/06_HOWGOODARE.pdf

Dudeney, G. (2010). The Internet and the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duffy, J., & McDonough, J. (2011). Teaching and Learning with Technology. Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Education, Inc.

English Club. Retrieved from http://www.englishclub.com/.

Forcier, R., & Descy, D (2008). The Computer As An Educational Tool. Colombus, Ohio: Pearson.

Hasan, L., & Abuelrub, E. (2011). Assessing the Quality of Websites. Journal of Applied Computing and Informatics, 9, 11-29.

Krajka, J., (2002). EFL/ESL portal sites - An attempt at a comparison. TESL-EJ, 6 (2). Retrieved March 9, 2014, from http://writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej22/m1.html.

Leander, K. (2000). Trends and Issues in Postsecondary English Studies. Urbana: National Council of teachers of English.

Tate, A.M. (2010). Web Wisdom: How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web. Taylor and Francis Group.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/katakita.3.2.7-12

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Supported by:

Indexed in:

  

   

Tools:

 



Stats (installed since 17 December 2018)
View My Stats