THE ILLOCUTIONARY ACT PRODUCED BY KATE REDDY TO JACK ABELHAMER AND CLARK IN “ I DON’T KNOW HOW SHE DOES IT”

Tri Erny Saliha(1*), Julia Eka Rini(2),


(1) English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to discuss the illocutionary acts produced by Kate Reddy in “I don’t Know How She Does It” movie, in the business communication with her business partner (Jack Abelhammer) and her boss (Clark). To support this study, the writer uses the theory of speech act by Austin (1962) and Paltridge (2006), illocutionary keywords by Searle (1969,1975), and the theory of context by Gee (2005). This research is a descriptive qualitative research because it is used it to form a descriptive qualitative conclusion to describe the illocutionary act occures in the conversation in this movie. From the findings, the writer finds out that  in order to make a sucessful business conversation, Kate produced four types of illocutionary acts to both her partner and her boss: representatives, directives, commissives, and expressives. Based on the findings, there are three similarities that the writer found: 1) the illocutionary act which is not used by Kate to her interlocutors is declarative, 2) the stage of illocutionary act produced by Kate to her interlocutors is the same to each other, and 3) there are the illocutionary act that is rejected by her interlocutors. Besides, the differences are also related to the use of various subtypes of Illocutionary act used by Kate to her partner and to her boss. Finally, the writer concludes that Illocutionary act plays an important role in Kate’s utterances since it helps Kate to state her intended meaning behind her utterances; to make a statement  to convince, to give suggestions, to make request and many more, to her interlocutors in their business conversation


Keywords


Illocutionary acts, movie, business communication, intended meaning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Austin J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Das, B.K. (2005). Twentieth century literary criticism. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers.

Gee. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis (2nd Ed). New York: Routledge.

Gimenez, J. (2006). Embedded business emails: meeting new demands in international business communication. p. 154–172

Grice, H.P (1969). The philosophical review. Durham: Duke University Press

Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis. London: MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1977). A classification of illocutionary acts in Rogers, A, Wall,B, & J. P. Murphy. Proceedings of the texas conference on performatives, presuppositions and implicatures. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguisitcs

Scannell,P. (2007). Media and communication. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.

Yule, G. (2006). The study of language (3rd Ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/katakita.4.2.66-72

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Supported by:

Indexed in:

  

   

Tools:

 



Stats (installed since 17 December 2018)
View My Stats