Politeness Strategies by Logan Paul and Mike Ajlak in THE DONALD TRUMP INTERVIEW – IMPAULSIVE EP. 418
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9744/katakita.13.2.253-258Abstract
This qualitative study examines the politeness strategies used by Logan Paul and Mike Ajlak in The Donald Trump Interview – IMPAULSIVE EP. 418. Using Brown and Levinson’s (1987) theory as cited in Watts (2003), it focuses on spoken utterances directed specifically at Donald Trump. The data consists of utterances by Paul as the main host and Ajlak as the co-host. The findings show that both use more positive politeness strategies. Paul applies all four main politeness strategies, including bald on record, while Ajlak uses only three: positive politeness, negative politeness, and off record. Although both use these three strategies, they differ in the specific sub-strategies applied within each category. They also share some unused strategies. Their roles influence how they use these strategies: Paul leads the conversation, while Ajlak supports it. Despite the differences, both remain polite, especially considering their guest is a former president. The study concludes that they apply different strategies based on their roles. Further research on politeness in political interviews is recommended.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).