The Horror of the “Better You”: Beauty Culture, Identity, and Feminist Horror in The Substance

Authors

  • Michelle Kiara Boediman Petra Christian University
  • Jenny Mochtar Petra Christian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/katakita.14.2.%25p

Keywords:

beauty standards, body horror, coralie fargeat, feminist horror

Abstract

Coralie Fargeat’s The Substance (2024) is a bold, body-horror-infused exploration of what it means to be a woman aging under the glare of the public eye. The film follows Elisabeth Sparkle, a fading fitness icon who turns to a mysterious biotechnology promising youth, beauty, and a “better self.” What begins as transformation quickly collapses into self-destruction as Elisabeth’s younger clone, Sue, takes over her life. Through this grotesque evolution, The Substance dismantles the makeover narrative so familiar in popular cinema, the idea that physical transformation equals empowerment, and instead exposes its rot.

This paper examines how The Substance rewrites beauty transformation tropes through horror, how this subversion fragments the identities of Elisabeth and Sue, and what the film ultimately reveals about societal pressures surrounding beauty, aging, and female selfhood. Drawing on genre theory, feminist film theory (particularly Laura Mulvey’s concept of the gaze), and cultural studies perspectives on beauty and postfeminism, I analyze how mise-en-scène and performance work together to visualize the horror of internalized beauty ideals.

In doing so, I argue that The Substance transforms the makeover fantasy into a nightmare of self-surveillance, turning the pursuit of perfection into a literal act of bodily consumption. Through its shocking imagery and deliberate ambiguity, Fargeat’s film critiques a culture that commodifies women’s bodies, punishes them for aging, and disguises conformity as empowerment.

References

Abrams, N., Bell, I., & Udris, J. (2001). Studying film. Bloomsbury Academic.

Budgeon, S. (2015). Individualized femininity and feminist politics of choice. European Journal of Women's Studies, 22(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815576602

Butler, J. (2013). For white girls only?: Post feminism and the politics of inclusion. Feminist Formations, 25(1), 35-58.

Čakardić, A. (2017). Down the neoliberal path: The rise of free choice feminism. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, 14, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i14.215

Fargeat, C. (Producer & Director), Bevan, T., & Fellner, E. (Producers). (2024). The Substance [Film]. Working Title Films.

Ferriss, S. (2007). Fashioning femininity in the makeover flick. In S. Ferriss & M. Young (Eds.), Chick flicks: Contemporary women at the movies. Routledge.

Gaut, B. (1993). The paradox of horror. British Journal of Aesthetics, 33(4), 333–345.

Hawco, V., & Salmon, M. (2025). The power of horror compels you: Exploring historical and modern genre conventions. Scaffold: Journal for the Comparative Studies of Literature, Art and Culture, 2(1).

Mulvey, L. (1992). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In The Sexual Subject: A Screen Reader in Sexuality (pp. 22–34). Routledge.

The Substance. (2024). [FILMGRAB]. https://film-grab.com/2024/11/08/the-substance/#

Teressa, C. M. (2025, January 26). 10 scariest horror movie monsters. The gamer. https://www.thegamer.com/scariest-horror-movie-monsters/

Yannetta, T. (2012, April 10). Presenting the best movie makeovers of all time (in before and after format, of course). Racked. https://www.racked.com/2012/4/10/7640377/presenting-the-best-movie-makeovers-of-all-time-in-before-and-after

Downloads

Published

2026-07-02

Issue

Section

Articles