QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS DELIVERED BY SENIOR AND JUNIOR ENGLISH TEACHERS AT A PRIVATE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL IN SIDOARJO

Authors

  • Bobby W Setiawan English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Esther H Kuntjara English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/katakita.2.3.17-23

Keywords:

Typology, Furniture, Layout, Padang Restaurant

Abstract

This study is related to a study of classroom discourse about delivering questions and instructions based on the cognitive domains done by senior and junior English teachers in secondary level. The study was conducted in the first grade of Senior High School which was facilitated by different English teacher,  It was revealed that all the questions and instructions delivered by both English teachers were mostly applied in the lowest level of cognitive domain (‘remembering’ and ‘understanding’) because those teachers considered the level of students because in this level, the first grade students were still needed to retrieve their memory, knowledge, and understanding of what they learned during the class time. However, those two teachers were still applied another domain. The number of cognitive domains applied were different. The senior teacher applied five of six cognitive domains while the junior teacher only applied four of six cognitive domains

Author Biographies

  • Bobby W Setiawan, English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia

    English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia

  • Esther H Kuntjara, English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia

    English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia

References

Amer, A (2004). A Lifelog Learning Approach to Pre-Service Teacher Education and In-Service Professional Development. Paper presented at: The Third International Conference: “Towards Better Education of Prospective Teacher” Sultan Qaboos University, College of Education, Muscat, Oman 1-3 March 2004.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of Educational objectives: New York: Longman.

Forehand, M (2005). Bloom’s taxonomy: Original and revised.In M. Orey (Ed).Emerging Perspective on Learning, Teaching, and Technology. Retrieved September 19, 2013.

Kerry, T. (2002). Explaining and Questioning. Cheltenham: Nelson Themes.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An overview: Theory Into Practice, 41 (4), 212-218.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction That Work: Research-Based Strategy For Increasing Student Achievement: Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2014)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).